Smith v. Kirk
Smith v. Kirk
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ASHLEY SMITH, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:21-cv-69 v.
RYAN KIRK; and RAYMOND ROTTACH TRANSPORT, LLC, Defendants.
ORDER The Court has been advised by the parties that the above-captioned case has settled. (Doc. 40.) Therefore, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, No. 6:07-CV-12,
2008 WL 2439736(S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008). Within forty-five (45) days of the date this Order is entered, the parties—if they wish— may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of their settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In the alternative, the parties may simply file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the parties fail to file a dismissal (or, if necessary, move to reopen the case) within forty-five (45) days, the Court will sua sponte dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381-82(1994). SO ORDERED, this 18th day of May, 2022.
f S ~ Lye R.STANBAKER— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Reference
- Status
- Unknown