Boatwright v. Broce
Trial Court Opinion
AO 450 (GAS Rev 09/20) Judgment in a Civil Case e e e United States District Court Southern District of Georgia BRITTNEY D. BOATWRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE v. CASE NUMBER: CV 222-038 CANDICE L. BROCE, et al., Defendants.
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
V] Decision by Court. This action came before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Order dated March 8, 2023, Plaintiffs concede that their official capacity claims for money damages are barred, so Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted as to those claims contained in Counts |, Il, and Ill. Plaintiffs withdraw the portion of their complaint seeking to enjoin the related actions in the Superior Court and the Juvenile Court, so Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted as to these claims in Count IV. Because the Court must abstain from deciding Plaintiffs’ other claims under the Younger Abstention Doctrine (Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)), Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted as to Plaintiffs’ remaining claims contained in Counts |, Il, Ill, and IV. This case stands closed.
= TER ky * oa SO) _ Ey 3 ¥ ae ‘ Approved by: a a EB HON. AAGODBEY WOOD, JUDGE ra UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT & SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Re | Ae aie Mpacalr 4 2.04" John E. Triplett, Acting Clerk Date Clerk Come haba)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.