Gardner v. Sikes

United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

Gardner v. Sikes

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION 1 RICHARD GARDNER, ) R19 AK 23 Plaintiff, 4— ) En □ V. ) CV 322-166 ‘\ LT. SIKES, Telfair State Prison; and HAYS TACTICAL SQUAD ON DUTY, ) Defendants.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. The Court has been informed the Report and Recommendation and accompanying Order have been returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable, with a notation indicating Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at Johnson State Prison. (See doc. no. 11.) The Court warned Plaintiff to inform the Court of any change of address in its October 28, 2022 Order, and his failure to do so evidences a failure to prosecute. (Doc. no. 3, p. 4); see Gilbert v. Daniels,

725 F. App’x 789

, 792-93 (11th Cir. 2018) (per curiam). Regardless, his complaint is due to be dismissed on the merits for failure to state a claim. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DISMISSES Plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and CLOSES this civil action. SO ORDERED this SH? yy of April, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia.

lf Mn

Reference

Status
Unknown