Goldwire v. Permar

United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

Goldwire v. Permar

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION MELANIE SMITH GOLDWIRE, ) Plaintiff, V. CV 123-129 JOSEPH PERMAR; AG ENERGY TRANSPORT, LLC; and PROTECTIVE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Defendants.

ORDER

On October 5, 2023, the Court ordered Defendants to provide sufficient evidence that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy. (See doc. no. 10.) On October 13, 2023, the parties jointly responded by submitting a detailed stipulation on damages. (See doc. no. 11.) The “evidence combined with reasonable deductions, reasonable inferences, [and] other reasonable extrapolations” demonstrates that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy. Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.,

608 F.3d 744, 754

(11th Cir. 2010). Thus, the Court finds that it has subject matter jurisdiction over the case at this time, and the case shall proceed. SO ORDERED this 16th day of October, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Reference

Status
Unknown