United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 2024

Low v. Roser

Low v. Roser
United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia · Decided August 16, 2024
Low v. Roser

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

SAVANNAH DIVISION

CHARLES R. LOW, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV421-187 )

CPL ROSER, ) )

Defendant. )

ORDER

The Court previously directed Defendant Charles R. Low to submit an amended complaint to address defects in his failure to protect claim against Defendant Roser. See doc. 13 at 6-9, 13-14. The deadline for him to submit his amendment has passed without any action from Low. See generally docket. Moreover, the Court’s Order has been returned by the United States Post Office as undeliverable. Docs. 14 & 15. It, therefore, appears that Low has failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address, as required by the Local Rules. See S.D. Ga. L. Civ. R. 11.1. Since he has failed to obey the Court’s Order, failed to comply with the Local Rules, and failed to prosecute this case, it is DISMISSED.

A district court retains the inherent power to police its docket and to enforce its orders. Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dept., 205 F. App’x 802, 802 (11th Cir. 2006). Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint may be dismissed either for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with an order of the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Additionally, this Court’s Local Rules provide that the Court may dismiss an action for want of prosecution when a party has “willful[ly] disobe[yed] .. . any order of the Court” or for “[a]ny other failure to prosecute a civil action with reasonable promptness.” S$.D. Ga. L.R. 41.1(b), (c). Low’s failure to prosecute this case and failure to respond to the Court’s Order warrant dismissal. Accordingly, his Complaint is DISMISSED for failing to obey a court order, the Local Rules, and failing to prosecute his case. Doc. 1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

SO ORDERED, this 16th day of August, 2024.

Anighan~d Me

CHRISTOPHER L. RAY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.