AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
TIMOTHY AMMONS IV., : : Plaintiff, : : No. 5:24-cv-00106-TES-CHW v. : : BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., : : Defendant. : : _________________________________
ORDER
Pro se Plaintiff Timothy Ammons, IV, an inmate at the Bibb County Jail in Macon, Georgia,1 filed a
42 U.S.C. § 1983civil rights Complaint. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without the statutory supporting documentation. ECF No. 3. On April 5, 2024, Plaintiff was ordered to either submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the preceding six months in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full filing fee. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was given fourteen (14) days to respond and was informed that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action.
Id.Plaintiff failed to respond. Therefore, on May 6, 2024, the Court notified Plaintiff that it had not received the filing fee or a certified account statement as ordered. ECF No. 6. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with
1 However, Plaintiff may no longer be incarcerated. Mail sent to the Bibb County Jail for the Plaintiff has twice been returned with a notation that Plaintiff is not in jail. See ECF Nos. 5 and 7. the Court’s previous order.
Id.The Court unambiguously informed Plaintiff that this action would be dismissed if he failed to comply with this Court’s orders.
Id.Plaintiff
was given fourteen (14) days to respond.
Id.Plaintiff once again did not respond. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s orders or otherwise prosecute his case, this Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t,
205 F. App’x 802, 802(11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (first citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and then citing Lopez v. Aransas Cnty. Indep. Sch. Dist.,
570 F.2d 541, 544(5th Cir. 1978)) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte
under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.”). SO ORDERED, this 30th day of May, 2024. S/Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Reference
- Status
- Unknown