UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION NASH N. TUTEN, ) ) Plaintiff, □ ) Vv. ) CV423-350 ) THE CITY OF SAVANNAH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), (doc. no. 6), to which no objections! have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motions? to Proceed In Forma Pauperis are DENIED, pursuant to

(g). (Docs. nos. 2 & 7.) Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Doc. no. 1); see also Dupree v. Palmer,

(11th Cir. 2002). The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. OF ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this day of January, 2024. AL] WG LA LATA, J. RANDAL HALI/ CHIEF JUDGE UNITED/ STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

1 Tuten did file a document titled “Summary Judgment.” (Doc. no. 9.) That document does not include anything that could be construed as an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Tuten is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to § 1915(g). 2 Tuten’s original Motion was not signed, (doc. no. 3), his second motion corrected that defect, (doc. no. 7).