IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION ANTHONY GENO MARTINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 124-227 ) MAJOR ASKEW; CAPTAIN SHERMAN; _ ) STAFF SERGEANT RIVERA; STAFF ) SERGEANT WILLIAMSON; ) LIEUTENANT WILSON; STAFF ) SERGEANT GAINS; STAFF SERGEANT _) DONALDSON; SHERIFF CLAY ) WHITTLE; SERGEANT CRITE; ) SERGEANT BOYD; LIEUTENANT ) COOPER; DEPUTY HOWELL; MS. S. ) WILLIS, CCDC Classifications; MS. ) ANDERSON, Sheriff’s Secretary/CCDC ) Admin; LIEUTENANT GREEN; and STAFF ) SERGEANT FANNING, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), DISMISSES this action without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he should be required to initiate a new lawsuit, which would

require submission of anew complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer,

(11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this / oath day of February, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia.

CHEE LZ RABLE J. RANDAL HAL STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUFHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA