WRIGHT v. ANCHOR SALES TOWING & RECOVERY LLC

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

WRIGHT v. ANCHOR SALES TOWING & RECOVERY LLC

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

RASHAD SAKELL WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:25-cv-230 (MTT) ) ANCHOR SALES TOWING & ) RECOVERY LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Rashad Sakell Wright filed this action and contemporaneously moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Docs. 1; 2. Along with granting Wright IFP status, the Court was required to screen his complaint pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e). After screening, the Court concluded that Wright’s complaint was deficient and ordered him to file a recast complaint no later than June 25, 2025. Doc. 3. Although Wright was warned that failure to fully and timely comply could result in the dismissal of this action, he did not respond. See Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t,

205 F. App’x 802, 802

(11th Cir. 2006) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Lopez v. Aransas Cty. Indep. Sch. Dist.,

570 F.2d 541, 544

(5th Cir. 1978)).1 Consequently, Wright was ordered to show cause no later than July 21, 2025 why this case should not be dismissed. Doc. 5. Wright was again warned that failure to comply may result in the dismissal of this action.

Id.

He did not respond. Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

1 The Eleventh Circuit has adopted as binding precedent the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. Bonner v. City of Prichard,

661 F.2d 1206, 1209

(11th Cir. 1981) (en banc). SO ORDERED, this 1st day of August, 2025. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Reference

Status
Unknown