United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, 2025

D.E.B.C. v. Warden, STEWART DETENTION CENTER, et al.

D.E.B.C. v. Warden, STEWART DETENTION CENTER, et al.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia · Decided December 30, 2025
D.E.B.C. v. Warden, STEWART DETENTION CENTER, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION D.E.B.C., : : Petitioner, : : v. : CASE NO.: 7:25-CV-198 (LAG) : Warden, STEWART DETENTION : CENTER, et al., : : Respondents. : : ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1).

Petitioner is a native and citizen of Guatemala who entered the United States on an unknown date without inspection and has resided in the United States since then. (Doc. 1 at ¶ 30; Doc. 1-1). On or about December 8, 2025, Petitioner was taken into United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody and has been detained since then. (Doc. 1 at ¶ 3). Petitioner contends that he is entitled to a discretionary bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Respondents argue that Petitioner is not entitled to a bond hearing because he is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), which mandates detention for certain aliens, without an opportunity for a bond hearing.

As Respondents concede, though, the issue presented in this action is identical to the issue decided in J.A.M. v. Streeval, No. 4:25-cv-342-CDL, 2025 WL 3050094 (M.D.

Ga. Nov. 1, 2025) and P.R.S. v. Streeval, No. 4:25-CV-330-CDL, 2025 WL 3269947 (M.D.

Ga. Nov. 24, 2025). (Doc. 8 at 2) This Court hereby adopts the court’s rationale in J.A.M. and P.R.S and finds that Petitioner’s detention is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). The Court thus grants Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the extent that the Court orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing within SEVEN (7) DAYS of this Order to determine if Petitioner may be released on bond under § 1226(a)(2) and the applicable regulations. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1 & 1236.1.1 SO ORDERED, this 30th day of December, 2025.

/s/ Leslie A. Gardner LESLIE A. GARDNER, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 On December 7, 2025, Petitioner filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) (Doc. 7). Because the Court now orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing, Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for TRO (Doc. 7) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.