Smith v. Picket

Supreme Court of Georgia
Smith v. Picket, 7 Ga. 104 (Ga. 1849)
Lumpkin

Smith v. Picket

Opinion of the Court

*105By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] We think the Court was right in holding Smith liable upon the garnishment. This was a contract of bailment merely, evidenced by the receipt; and the baifor* having been garnisheed before the cotton was sold by the bailee^" he became responsible to the creditor of Hardwick upon the summons, and delivered over the property in his own wrong.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hampton S. Smith, in error v. James R. Picket
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published