Watts v. Kilburn
Watts v. Kilburn
Opinion of the Court
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion.
In the case of Grady vs. Hightower, (1 Kelly, 252,) the objection was taken to the hearing of the motion for a new trial, because there was no brief of the testimony filed when the application was made; and the exception being overruled by the Court, it brought up the question directly for review. But here, no such point was made on the motion for a new trial in the Court below ; of course, it cannot be raised here now.
This Court will hear no cause, until a complete record shall be filed, containing within itself, without references, aliunde, all the papers, exhibits, depositions, and other proceedings, which - are necessary to a proper determination in this Court. We do not perceive that any material matter or thing is wanting. The time and place of the execution of the bill of sale, together with the consideration, are testified to. It is not indispensable, therefore, that the original, or a copy, should be before us.
Let the cause be argued on the merits.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Seaborn B. Watts, in error v. Joseph K. Kilburn
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published