Bank of St. Mary's v. Brooks
Bank of St. Mary's v. Brooks
Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
delivering the qpinion.
In our judgment, the Act of 1842 settles this question in favor of the plaintiff in the Justice’s Court. CobVs Big. 652.
By the 3d section of the Act of 1819, Justices of the Peace are empowered to give judgment for any sum not exceeding thirty dollars, exclusive of interest and cost.
In this case, the plaintiff would be entitled to judgment for the interest due on the bills, as a legal incident resulting from the non-payment thereof by the bank, which interest is definitely fixed by lato. So in regard to the ten per cent, damages, the plaintiff is entitled to the ten per cent, damages as a fixed legal incident, resulting from the non-payment of the bills in specie, when demanded.
The Justice gives judgment for thirty dollars in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant; the recovery of the interest and damages, necessarily follows, by operation of laid; the Statute
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.