By the Court.

delivering the opinion,

[1.] The assignments of error in this case are based upon the refusal of the Court below of a motion for continuance; and for the reasons which we give, when considering the motion for continuance, in the case of Ezekiel A. Roberts and Gideon Copenhaven vs. the State, arising out of an indictment for robbery, decided at this term*, we think the judgment of the Court was correct in this case, and accordingly we affirm it.