Beckwith v. Carleton & Co.
Beckwith v. Carleton & Co.
Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
A “ complaint” was filed under the Short Forms Act, in Muscogee Superior Court, at the instance of Oarleton & Co. on two promissory notes, against Samuel Beckwith, as maker, and Edward Taylor as indorser, amounting, together, to eleven hundred and fourteen dollars and four cents. The notes were to be paid at the agency of the Mechanic’s Bank at Columbus. On the trial, when the declaration was read, it was demurred to, on the ground of the mis-joinder of improper defendants. The Court over-ruled the objection, and the defendants’ counsel excepted.
When the notes were tendered in evidence, the defendants, severally, objected to their being read to the Jury. I am notable to comprehend, very clearly, on what ground the maker objected; but the objection, on the part of the indorser, was, that this being bankable paper, in contemplation of our Law, a demand on the maker and notice to the indorser, were necessary, in order to charge the indorser ; and that there was no averment in the writ, which authorized this proof to be admitted.
The Court over-ruled the objection and allowed the notes to
When the Jury came into Court to deliver their verdict, defendants’ counsel objected to its being received and recorded, on account of its uncertainty. It found eleven hundred and fourteen dollars and four cents for the plaintiff, with interest and cost. This objection was over-ruled' and thereupon, defendant’s counsel excepted.
For the sake of convenience, I shall reverse the order in which the exceptions stand upon the record, and dispose of the last first.
Consequently, upon this ground, the judgment below- must be reversed, and a non-suit ordered, provided there be no power given, under any of the English Statutes of Jeofails, or of our own, which are much broader, to amend the complaint, by striking out either one of the defendants, and allowing it to stand, as to the other.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- S. G. Beckwith and another, in error v. Carleton & Co.
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published