Pool v. Huff
Supreme Court of Georgia
Pool v. Huff, 20 Ga. 671 (Ga. 1856)
Benning
Pool v. Huff
Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
Ought the Court to have granted the motion for a new trial ? We think so.
•There was not a particle of evidence against Pool, the defendant. What evidence there was, was all against Pool, the witness.
And as against the witness, the evidence did not make out a case of damage to the amount of as much as forty-three-dollars.
We regret to have to reverse a judgment and grant a new trial in so small a case, but we do not see how granting one is to be avoided»
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John S. Pool, in error v. Robert Huff and Cornelius Stewart, in error
- Status
- Published