Matthews v. Browning
Matthews v. Browning
Opinion of the Court
By the Court—
delivering the opinion.
Section 571 of the Code authorizes any justice of the In
This duty as to peddlers was a part of their duty; any one of the five justices might perform it. We think the Constitution of 1868, confers upon the Ordinary, in general terms, the duties of the Inferior Court, and this includes the duties which it required the whole Court to perform, as also the duties cast upon a majority of the Court, or upon one of the Justices. He stands in the place, not only of the body, but of each member of the body.
.The Ordinary had therefore jurisdiction to issue this fi. fa. The sheriff was not a trespasser, there was no duress, and the possessory warrant is not the proper remedy in this case.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WILLIAM H. MATTHEWS, in error v. JAMES BROWNING, in error
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published