Ponder v. McGruder
Ponder v. McGruder
42 Ga. 242
Ponder v. McGruder
Opinion of the Court
The motion for a continuance of the case was properly overruled, on the showing made therefor. The defendant rented the ’premises of the plaintiff, to whom the rents and profits thereof belonged, according to the evidence disclosed in the record, and the action was properly brought in his name to recover the rent due from the defendant, under his contract with the plaintiff, without describing himself as trustee.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.