Clements v. Lyon
Clements v. Lyon
Opinion of the Court
We think the court should have heard the application of the heirs of the defendant in ft. fa. to be-permitted to come in and show, if they could, thát the sale in 1861 was fraudulent or illegal. True, the sheriff was the party the rule called upon, but the applicants were the real parties at interest, and under our broad system of pleading at law it would be an anomaly to. stick so close in the bark as to rule out the real parties at interest, on the ground that the sheriff is the party called on. Nothing is more common in proceedings against the sheriff than side issues of this character. The court could have required a regular issue to be made up and tried before a jury, and the rights of the parties settled without further complication. In Wade vs. Simeon, 13 M. & W., 649, Pollock, C. B., says: “ We think there can be no doubt that in any stage of the proceedings, as long as there remains any necessity for an appeal to the authority of the court, or any occasion to call on the court to exercise its jurisdiction, it has
Judgment reversed.-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.