Peacock v. Eubanks
Peacock v. Eubanks
Opinion
The writ of error to a decision of the superior coui-t must be returned to the next term of the supreme court after such decision is rendered, after allowing the various times prescribed by law for service, filing, transmission, etc., otherwise it will be dismissed. (E.)
Bill of exceptions. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court. January Term, 1874.
When the above stated case was called, counsel for defendants moved to dismiss the writ of error because it was properly returnable lo the last term of the court. The facts relied upon to sustain such motion were as follows:
The court sustained the motion, enunciating the principle embraced in the above head-note.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Elbert Peacock, in error v. James D. Eubanks, in error
- Status
- Published