Turk v. Ross
Turk v. Ross
Opinion of the Court
The priority of debts is established by Code, §2533. This
Cited by plaintiffs in error: 1 Chit. Pl. 1; Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Colesby vs. Dart, 59 Ga.; 8 Ib., 236; 10 Ib., 266; 25 Ib., 152; Code, §2542; 41 Ga., 307; Hayden vs. Johnson, 59 Ib.; Acts of 1869, p. 134; 45 Ga., 478; 57 Ib., 459; Code, §§2922, 2926; 46 Ga., 361; 48 Ib., 150, 471; 57 Ib., 227; 41 Ib., 579; Brandon vs. Low, 59 Ib.; Johnson vs. McCullough, Ib.; Code, §§1947, 3596, 3317, 3594, 3210, 3081, 3095, 3096, 4178; 22 Ga., 123; 3 Cent. Law J., 785; High on Inj., §§44, 45; 2 Story’s Eq., §875.
Cited by defendants: Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Code, §§3144, 2918, 2607; Adams’ Eq., 258, and note; Story’s Eq. Pl., §99.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cordelia Turk, in error v. Roland T. Ross, , in error
- Status
- Published