Turk v. Ross

Supreme Court of Georgia
Turk v. Ross, 59 Ga. 378 (Ga. 1877)
Bleckley

Turk v. Ross

Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

The priority of debts is established by Code, §2533. This *380is not to be altered by subsequent judgments. 45 Ga., 205. Creditors can contest priority after judgment as well' as before. This being so, there is no reason for enjoining suits against the executor.

Cited by plaintiffs in error: 1 Chit. Pl. 1; Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Colesby vs. Dart, 59 Ga.; 8 Ib., 236; 10 Ib., 266; 25 Ib., 152; Code, §2542; 41 Ga., 307; Hayden vs. Johnson, 59 Ib.; Acts of 1869, p. 134; 45 Ga., 478; 57 Ib., 459; Code, §§2922, 2926; 46 Ga., 361; 48 Ib., 150, 471; 57 Ib., 227; 41 Ib., 579; Brandon vs. Low, 59 Ib.; Johnson vs. McCullough, Ib.; Code, §§1947, 3596, 3317, 3594, 3210, 3081, 3095, 3096, 4178; 22 Ga., 123; 3 Cent. Law J., 785; High on Inj., §§44, 45; 2 Story’s Eq., §875.

Cited by defendants: Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Code, §§3144, 2918, 2607; Adams’ Eq., 258, and note; Story’s Eq. Pl., §99.

Judgment reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cordelia Turk, in error v. Roland T. Ross, , in error
Status
Published