Cathing v. State
Cathing v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant, being a minor, was sentenced to twelve months’ work in the chain-gang, and to be hired out until the cost of the prosecution was paid. After the expiration of his term of imprisonment in the chain-gang, and pending his service as a hireling to pay cost, his natural guardian, as he styles himself, made a motion in the superior court to set aside the part of the judgment or sentence in relation to the hiring of the minor and to have restitution of the money paid by the hirer to the county. The court overruled the motion, and the movant excepted.
It seems.to us clear that the court was right. No exception was taken to the sentence at the time it was pronounced ; no motion was made for a .new trial; and the sentence of the court, legal or illegal, was in regular process of execution.
Can this natural guardian interpose in this way ?
We think not. The Code seems to confihe the right of making the motion to set aside a judgment to the parties to the judgment — Code, §§3587,3588. It would be very bad policy, we think, to permit anybody who might claim to be the natural guardian, or to hold other relations of like character, or to be interested in the labor of a convict, to move to set aside the sentence or any part thereof, while the same was being
So we affirm the judgment of the superior court dismissing the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.