Athens City Water-Works Co. v. Mayor of Athens
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Brandywine Townhouses, Inc. v. Joint City-County Board of Tax Assessors (Ga. 1974)
- Mundy v. Van Hoose (Ga. 1898)
- Hicks v. Florida State Board of Administration (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)
- Institute of Nuclear Power Operations v. Cobb County Board (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
- Collins v. City of Dalton (Ga. 1991)
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. Jones (Ga. 1974)
- Cherokee Brick & Tile Co. v. Redwine (Ga. 1953)
- Davis v. City of Atlanta (Ga. 1950)
- Burkett v. State (Ga. 1945)
- Davis v. Smith (Ga. 1943)
- Regenstein v. State Revenue Commission (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
- Norris v. Town of Union City (Ga. 1937)
- City of Columbus v. Muscogee Mfg. Co. (Ga. 1927)
- Tarver v. City of Albany (Ga. 1925)
- Brenau Ass'n v. Harbison (Ga. 1904)
- Board of Trustees v. City of Atlanta (Ga. 1901)
- Georgia State B. & L. Ass'n v. Mayor of Savannah (Ga. 1900)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is contended by the plaintiff in error that, by the contract between it and the defendant in error, the waterworks are exempt from taxes. If this is so, it must appear from the contract. In looking at the contract between these partios, there does not appear any stipulation which exempts this company from taxation, nor can the same be implied from the contract. Taxation is the rule, and exemption the exception. No property except that specially mentioned can be exempted from taxation (see the constitution of 1877 of this state); but without this, there is nothing in the contract between these parties which would exempt plaintiff in error from taxation. The charter of the city of Athens authorizes this tax (see act of 1872); and there being nothing in the contract between these parties, either expressly or impliedly, to relieve the company from taxation, and nothing in the circumstances of the case, they are liable to be taxed. See
So we think that the court below did right to dismiss the plaintiff’s action on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.