Roberts v. State
Roberts v. State
1 Ga. L. Rep. 65
Roberts v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence sustains the verdict.
2. There was no such error in the refusals to charge as to require a ■new trial. In substance, all were given, and the entire charge is as ■favorable to the plaintiff in error as the law and facts would allow.
3. The confessions were made voluntarily, and are corroborated -abundantly by the bill of sale, the money and the inconsistency of the ^statements themselves.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.