Barnett v. Northeastern Railroad

Under the facts as disclosed by the record, the court erred in granting a nonsuit in this ease. The testimony introduced by the plaintiff* as to the negligence of the company was, in our judgment, sufficient to put the defendant upon its defence, and to require it to explain the acts complained of by the plaintiff*. The testimony as to who was the employer of the plaintiff* was also sufficient to require it to be submitted to the jury.

Judgment reversed.