Grant v. State
Grant v. State
87 Ga. 265; 13 S.E. 554; 1891 Ga. LEXIS 146
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- East v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
- Graham v. State (Ga. 1920)
- Lane v. City of Millen (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
- Farmer v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
- Myers v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
- King v. City of Hazlehurst (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
- Slaughter v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
- Touchstone v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
- Irwin v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1910)
- Bray v. City of Commerce (Ga. Ct. App. 1909)
- Shaw v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1908)
- Barlow v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1908)
- Billups v. State (Ga. 1899)
- Cowart v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
- Mack v. State (Ga. 1902)
- Williams v. State (Ga. 1899)
- Cunningham v. State (Ga. 1898)
- Evans v. State (Ga. 1897)
- White v. State (Ga. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In a prohibition county, a person who receives money from another with a request to procure whisky, and who shortly afterward delivers the whisky, may be treated as the seller if no other person filling that character appears, and if it is not shown where, how or from whom the whisky was obtained. This case is controlled in principle by Paschal v. The State, 84 Ga. 326.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.