W. R. Daley, Evans & Evans, T. H. Potter, and Hines, Shubricic & Eelber, for plaintiffs in error., A. E. Daley, by brief, contra.
Kent v. Davis
Opinion of the Court
*151Judgment affirmed.
The defendants demurred on the following grounds : The allegations in the declaration do not entitle plaintiffs to the relief sought or any other relief; the title to the personalty mentioned is not in plaintiffs, the right to sue being only in the administrator of Bryant Kent; and defendant Downs has a good title by prescription to the land of which he is alleged to be in possession. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants excepted.W. R. Daley, Evans & Evans, T. H. Potter, and Hines, Shubricic & Eelber, for plaintiffs in error.A. E. Daley, by brief, contra.