Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Peterson
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Peterson
Opinion of the Court
Peterson sued the railroad company for damages from tbe killing of bis cow. He obtained a verdict for $25, interest and costs. By certiorari tbe defendant alleged that tbe verdict was contrary to evidence, without evidence to support it, excessive, and contrary to law and tbe principles of justice and equity; that the presumption of liability raised by law against it, by showing that tbe injury to tbe cow was caused by its engine and cars, was fully overcome by tbe undisputed testimony that its agents exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence to prevent tbe accident, and that tbe accident was unavoidable. Further, that tbe verdict was illegal, in that it found plaintiff to be entitled to interest as interest. The judge of the superior court overruled tbe certioi ari upon tbe plaintiff writing off tbe interest, and ordered tbe defendant to pay tbe costs, to which ruling it excepted.
Upon tbe trial in tbe magistrate’s court plaintiff testified : About December 27, 1888, be bad a cow killed on tbe Macon branch of defendant’s road. When be found her she was at tbe end of a cut with her head lying towards Macon, was bruised on tbe hip and her bind legs were broken. She was worth about $75; was of great help to him in supporting his family frona tbe quantity of milk she gave. He signed a paper, and it was his idea when be signed it that be would get tbe value of bis cow; but be has never received any money from defendant for killing her.
For defendant tbe engineer in charge of tbe engine at
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.