Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893

Joseph v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

Joseph v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided July 26, 1893 · Bleckley
92 Ga. 332; 18 S.E. 294
Joseph v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

It was the duty of counsel to tender to the judge a correct bill of exceptions within thirty days after the adjournment of court. In this instance no such bill of exceptions was tendered until more than four months after adjournment. What transpired in the meantime is indicated in the first head-note. We think the delay was inexcusable and unreasonable. The second headnote sets forth what we deem a proper construction of *333the act of November 11th, 1889, with reference to the judge’s duty in altering bills of exception when found to be incorrect. The motion to dismiss must prevail.

Writ of error dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.