Gardner v. Waycross Air-Line Railroad
Gardner v. Waycross Air-Line Railroad
Opinion of the Court
The declaration alleged, that plaintiff' entered defendant’s passenger-train at Waycross at the regular and usual place of receiving passengers, just before the usual time for the train to start. No engine was then attached to the train ; and desiring to speak to the conductor about being put off' the train at a point just beyond Waltertown, a station on said railroad, plaintiff went into the baggage-car for that purpose, and while thus engaged with the conductor, defendant’s agents and servants, without any notice or warning to plaintiff and without the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care, negligently turned loose an engine at the upper end of the yard, and said car came down the track and •struck the car i'n which plaintiff' was standing, throwing him to the floor and injuring him in a manner described. He had not purchased a ticket, as they sold none at that time. He had money with which to pay his fare, and Lad entered the train as a passenger with the intention •of traveling just beyond the river at Waltertown. Before he left the passengei’-coach and entered the baggage-car, he looked out and saw that there was no engine at or near the train; and with the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care on the part of the defendant’s agents and employees the accident could have been .averted.
The defendant demurred on the ground that the declaration set out no cause of action; whereupon the plaintiff amended “by striking the allegation that a car
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.