Griggs v. Willbanks

Supreme Court of Georgia
Griggs v. Willbanks, 96 Ga. 744 (Ga. 1895)
22 S.E. 327
Simmons

Griggs v. Willbanks

Opinion of the Court

Simmons, C. J.

The dismissal of a counter-affidavit to a distress-warrant leaves nothing to be tried, and the distress warrant at-once becomes again operative as final process. This being so, a verdict and judgment rendered upon a distress warrant against the defendant therein and the sureties on his bond for the eventual condemnation money, after the dismissal of the counter-affidavit, was void; and an illegality filed by the sureties to the enforcement, of an execution issued upon such judgment was rightly sustained. Habersham v. Eppinger, 61 Ga. 199; McCulloch v. Good, 63 Ga. 519; Anders v. Blount, 67 Ga. 41; Girtman v. Stanford, 68 Ga. 178.

Judgment affirmed.

W. T. Crane, C. II. Sutton and W. I. Pike, for plaintiffs. Jones & Bowden, by M. G-. Boyd, for defendant.

Reference

Cited By
15 cases
Status
Published