Wiggins v. Tumlin
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ritchie & Wells v. Irvin (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)
- Matter of Mae Disorda Savage (Vt. 1941)
- Solomon v. Dunlap-Huckabee Auto Co. (Ga. 1932)
- Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. M. Mitshkun Co. (Mich. 1926)
- Kidd v. Kidd (Ga. 1924)
- U. S. Supply Co. v. Andrews (Okla. 1918)
- Stambaugh v. Cantwell Hardware Co. (Hardin County Court of Common Pleas 1917)
- Walton v. Shakespear (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
- In re Thomas (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 1916)
- Furst Bros. v. Commercial Bank (Ga. 1903)
- Evans v. Napier, Worsham & Co. (Ga. 1900)
- Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co. (Ga. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where the owner of personal property delivered the same to another on trial and for use, with the understanding that if the property suited the latter, the parties would close a trade for the sale thereof and that papers for this purpose should then be executed, there being no limit as to the length of time during which the property might be kept on trial, and no binding obligation to purchase upon the party receiving it, this was a mere bailment of the property and not a sale; and if afterwards the party so receiving the property decided to purchase it, and accordingly executed a note for the purchase money secured by mortgage, the title did not pass to the purchaser until the contract of sale was thus made and completed.
.■2. The lien of a mortgage on personalty given contemporaneously with the sale thereof to secure the purchase money, is of superior dignity to that of a judgment rendered against the mortgagor prior to the purchase and the giving of the mortgage for the purpose stated; and if after the maturity of the purchase money debt thus secured, the mortgagor, without requiring a foreclosure of the mortgage, in good faith and without fraud of any kind, returns the mortgaged property to his creditor in satisfaction of the mortgage debt, the fair value of the property not then being greater in amount than the purchase money thus paid, the property in question is not, either in the hands of the mortgagee or of his subsequent vendee, subject to an execution founded on the judgment above mentioned. Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.