Curran, Scott & Co. v. Rome Iron Co.
Curran, Scott & Co. v. Rome Iron Co.
96 Ga. 756
Curran, Scott & Co. v. Rome Iron Co.
Opinion of the Court
It appearing that the evidence introduced before the jury in the justice’s court was conflicting, and that counsel for the prevailing party at the trial in that court improperly commented on facts not in evidence, this court will not reverse a judgment of the superior court by which a certiorari, sued out by the losing party, was sustained and a new trial ordered.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.