Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia
Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad, 97 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1895)
22 S.E. 918
Simmons

Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence introduced hy the plaintiff showing clearly that, even if the defendant was negligent at all, the plaintiff, after its negligence began, might hy the exercise of ordinary care easily have avoided being injured, he was not entitled to recover. The court was therefore right in granting a nonsuit. ' Judgment affirmed.

Grace & J ones, for plaintiff. Bacon & Miller, for defendant.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cain v. The Macon Consolidated Street Railroad Co.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published