Seymour v. Daniel
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Stamps v. Tisinger (Ga. 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Most of the numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial fail entirely to plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of, but on the contrary, are too vague, con- . fused, indefinite and unintelligible for consideration by this, court; in none of the grounds does it appear that any error requiring a new trial was committed; the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not set it aside.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.