Constitution Publishing Co. v. Stegall
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Reeves v. South America Managers, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
- City of Eatonton v. Peck (Ga. 1951)
- Holcombe v. Jones (Ga. 1944)
- Hirsch v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. (Ga. 1941)
- Rembert v. Ellis (Ga. 1941)
- Pope v. Barnett (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Crowley v. Calhoun (Ga. 1925)
- Burkhalter v. Lanier (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
- Hubbard v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. (Ga. 1908)
- Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Talbotton Creamery & Manufacturing Co. (Ga. 1898)
- Mitchell v. Southern Railway Co. (Ga. 1903)
- Pattillo v. Jones (Ga. 1901)
- Candler v. Kirkland (Ga. 1900)
- Sasser v. Adkins (Ga. 1899)
- Anderson v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. (Ga. 1899)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The declaration, as it appears in the record, without amendment, sets forth a cause of action, and the general demurrer thereto was properly overruled.
2. The office of a demurrer is to test the legal sufficiency of ^a declaration upon the facts as they are therein alleged; and being so limited, its scope cannot, by an agreed statement of facts which neither amends nor purports to amend the declaration, be extended to cover questions which might arise upon a motion for nonsuit upon a statement of facts otherwise than by the declaration appearing. Judgment affirmed.
97 406| ,101 3891
'97 40li| 103 686|
97 4001 8118 6191 97 406 113 692
97 406I 119 6S|
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.