Rawls v. Moye
Supreme Court of Georgia
Rawls v. Moye, 98 Ga. 564 (Ga. 1896)
25 S.E. 582
Lumpkin
Rawls v. Moye
Opinion of the Court
Under tbe facts recited, the assignee took nothing except the tenant’s obligation to pay rent. An express assignment was indispensably necessary to pass the landlord’s lien for supplies, provided- for in the contract. The mere transfer •of “the within rent note” was not an assignment of any lien. See Lathrop & Co. v. Clewis, 63 Ga. 282.
Judgment reversed1
Reference
- Full Case Name
- RAWLS v. MOYE
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published