The evidence, though decidedly conflicting, warranted a finding that the plaintiff was entitled to alimony, including attorney’s fees; the charge, as a whole, very fully and fairly submitted to the jury the issues in controversy, and even if it was in some respects not entirely accurate, it contained no error which would justify this court in setting aside the verdict, the amount of which was not’so large as to necessitate a holding that it was excessive. Judgment affirmed.