Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897

Harris v. City Council

Harris v. City Council
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 4, 1897 · Cobb
100 Ga. 382; 28 S.E. 161; 1897 Ga. LEXIS 69

Counsel

Charles A. Picquet and Salem Dutdher, for plaintiff., M. P. Carroll, for defendant.

Harris v. City Council

Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Justice.

Under the act of 1856 (Acts 1855-56, p. 248, sec. 16), the recorder of the city of Augusta has power “to commit or to impose such penalty as the ordinances of the city may prescribe, and to' enforce his judgment by attachment of the person.” Under this authority the recorder could impose a fine which was expressly authorized by the ordinances of the city, and enforce its payment by imprisonment, although there was no ordinance declaring that he had authority to impose a penalty of imprisonment. The charter power conferred upon him to “commit . . and enforce his judgment by attachment of the person” confers upon him the power to imprison, without any enabling ordinance.

Judgment affirmed.

All five J ustices concurring.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.