Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins
Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins
102 Ga. 586; 27 S.E. 785; 1897 Ga. LEXIS 632
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Smith v. Telecable of Columbus, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
- Denney v. Tate (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
- Murray v. Davidson (Ga. 1932)
- Bluestein v. Amason (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This being the first grant of a new.trial, the judgment'below will not be disturbed by this court; for, although the new trial was granted upon a special ground, it does not affirmatively appear that the law and the facts necessarily required the verdict which the jury rendered. Civil Code, 25585; Johnson v. Georgia R. R. Co., ante, 577.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.