Cates v. Itner
Cates v. Itner
104 Ga. 679; 30 S.E. 884; 1898 Ga. LEXIS 398
Opinion of the Court
The evidence in the record clearly shows that the plaintiff in this case was injured by reason of the negligence of a fellow-servant. This being true, he can not recover of the master. McDonald v. Eagle & Phenix Mfg. Co., 67 Ga. 761; s. c., fully reported, 68 Ga. 839; Stanley v. R. & D. Ext. Co., 72 Ga. 202; McGovern v. Columbus Mfg. Co., 80 Ga. 227.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.