Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898

Cates v. Itner

Cates v. Itner
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided June 7, 1898 · Simmons
104 Ga. 679; 30 S.E. 884; 1898 Ga. LEXIS 398

Counsel

P. F. Smith and P. P. Shropshire, for plaintiff., Watkins & Dean, for defendant.

Cates v. Itner

Opinion of the Court

Simmons, O. J.

The evidence in the record clearly shows that the plaintiff in this case was injured by reason of the negligence of a fellow-servant. This being true, he can not recover of the master. McDonald v. Eagle & Phenix Mfg. Co., 67 Ga. 761; s. c., fully reported, 68 Ga. 839; Stanley v. R. & D. Ext. Co., 72 Ga. 202; McGovern v. Columbus Mfg. Co., 80 Ga. 227.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concwrring.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.