This being an action against a city for damages alleged to have been occasioned to the plaintiffs property by raising a street' above the level thereof, and the evidence being conflicting upon the question whether the place filled in constituted a portion of a street or was a part of an “ approach ” to a county bridge, and also upon the question whether or not the work was done by the municipal or by the county authorities, this court will not disturb a verdict in the plaintiffs favor, there being sufficient evidence to support the same, and no special question of law being raised in the record.

Judgment affirmed.