King v. Shepard & Co.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Clarke (Ga. 1939)
- Muhs v. River Rats, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 2008)
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Coleman (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
- Bailey v. Warlick (Ga. 1943)
- Carter v. Marble Products Inc. (Ga. 1934)
- Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
- Burgess v. Friar (Ga. 1936)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. An agreement in writing containing admissions of fact, though made for the purposes of a particular trial and after-wards withdrawn, is nevertheless admissible in evidence against the party making such agreement, in favor of the opposite party, in a subsequent trial of the same case. Such agreement is not, however, absolutely binding and conclusive upon the party by whom it was signed; but it is his right to disprove, rebut or explain any statement therein contained. See Luther v. Clay, 100 Ga. 236.
2. The evidence warranted the judgment rendered by the judge, who by consent tried this case without the intervention of a jury, and it will not be disturbed by this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.