Stephens v. State
Stephens v. State
Opinion of the Court
John Stephens was convicted of murder, with recommendation of life imprisonment. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and he excepted. The motion set forth that the verdict was contrary to law, decidedly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to specified portions of the judge’s charge; the last objection, of course, being equivalent to the second, — that the verdict was contrary to law.
We gather from the testimony of the witnesses for the State, that Kershaw, the deceased, and Oarr, Adams and Morrissey -were in Randall’s bar, where the accused was an employee. Kershaw called for beer for the party, and deceased was requested to draw it. As he started to do so, Kershaw, according to one of the witnesses, said something about the accused being slow. Carr told the accused to get a move on him, and upon the accused asking him, in what Carr termed an insolent manner, what he had said, Carr reached over the bar counter, behind which the accused was standing, and struck or punched at him with his fist. Without waiting to get the beer, Kershaw and his friends started out, and Kershaw said to Oarr, “son of a bitch,” or, as one of the witnesses testified, “damn yellow son of a bitch, and didn’t want to wait on us.” The accused said, “You are narry one,” or, “You are not a son of a bitch.” Adams testified: “When he [the accused] said that, Kershaw turned to go back, and I caught hold of him and says, ‘Jim, come on and let’s go; don’t go back there’; and he pulled loose and started back, and I caught him as he was going back from behind the grocery department to the bar, and as we walked behind [the counter ?] I had hold of his right arm, and the negro had his gun to his shoulder and both barrels cocked, and he
We do not think the evidence for the State authorized a verdict for murder. The deceased began the altercation, was the aggressor in the difficulty, and at the time he was shot was advancing upon the accused, who was where he was employed to be, and who was backing from the deceased and warning him that he, the accused, would shoot if the deceased came on him. Under the State’s evidence and the law, which the court correctly gave in charge, the homicide was not murder. Justice to the accused demands that a new trial be granted.
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STEPHENS v. State
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published