Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899

Benson v. Shines

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided April 25, 1899 · Simmons

107 Ga. 406; 33 S.E. 439; 1899 Ga. LEXIS 86

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

Hunter v. Lanier (Ga. Ct. App. 1946)
McEachern v. Clark (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
Marks v. Henry (Ga. Ct. App. 1952)
Maddox v. Waldrop (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
Executive Committee of Baptist Convention v. Smith (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
Commercial Credit Co. v. Cummings (S.C. 1929)
Ringgold v. Graham (Tex. Comm'n App. 1929)
Commercial Credit Co. v. Cummings (S.C. 1929)
Dillingham v. Eslinger (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
Jefferson Banking Co. v. Trustees of Martin Institute (Ga. 1917)
Armour Car Lines v. Summerour (Ga. Ct. App. 1909)
Samples v. Samples (Ga. 1942)
Levin v. American Furniture Co. (Ga. 1909)
Fisher v. Pearson (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)
McMurria v. Powell Bros. & Chason (Ga. 1904)
Napier Bros. v. Woodall (Ga. 1903)
Harvely v. Daly & Co. (Ga. 1901)
Chapele v. Tucker (Ga. 1900)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Simmons, C. J.

McCrory employed Benson to repair a house. Benson employed Shines to do the plastering. Shines recorded his lien, and brought suit in the county court to foreclose it against Benson and prayed a judgment against Benson and a special judgment against the property. McCrory was-not made a party to the suit by the petition, nor was process-prayed against him. He appeared, however, in the county court and demurred to the petition, and, his demurrer being overruled, filed a plea to the merits. The county judge-awarded judgment against Benson, the contractor, and a special lien upon the property of McCrory for the amount due Shines.

1. While McCrory was not made a party in the petition and while process was not prayed against him, and while there was no order taken in the county court to make him a party, we-think his appearance in the court by filing a demurrer and a plea to the merits and introducing testimony thereunder made him a party to the action and he was bound by the judgment against his property. A person who is interested in the result-of litigation may voluntarily make himself a party thereto by appearing and pleading, although he is not mentioned as a. party in the petition, which prays no process against him. *407See 2 Black, Judg. § 534; Hukm Chand, Res. Jud. § 71; Brown v. Chaney, 1 Kelly, 412.

2. From the judgment of the county court Benson sought to enter an appeal to the superior court, McCrory being the only security upon the appeal bond. Shines moved to dismiss the appeal, and the judge of the superior court granted the motion and dismissed the appeal, refusing to allow the appellant to amend the bond by giving additional security. We think that the court rightly refused to allow the appellant to give additional surety and rightly dismissed the appeal. In cases of appeal there must be a bond with security, and one already bound by the judgment gives no additional guaranty or security to the appellee. This bond was therefore without security, was a nullity, and could not be amended by giving security. Osborne v. Hughes, 93 Ga. 445; Eufaula etc. Co. v. Plant, 36 Ga. 623; Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.