Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Young v. Kendrick (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
- Greer & Co. v. Raney (Ga. 1904)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence claimed to have been newly discovered being cumulative on points directly under investigation at the trial, as well as impeaching, and being such as could have been easily discovered by the exercise of the very slightest diligence, it was not of such a character as to authorize the granting of a new trial.
2. No error of law was complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.