Dockins v. State
Dockins v. State
110 Ga. 277; 34 S.E. 846; 1899 Ga. LEXIS 549
Dockins v. State
Opinion of the Court
Even if the court erred in admitting illegal testimony, the same could not, in view of the evidence admitted without objection, have resulted in any injury to the accused, and the verdict of guilty was warranted.
Judgment affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. The court erred in admitting hearsay testimony, and, as the same may haye been prejudicial to the accused, there should be a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.