Ansley v. Davidson & Co.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tom Hewitt Auto Auction Co. v. Vickers (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
- Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)
- Jones v. Gate City Lodge No. 54 (Ga. 1931)
- Roberts v. City of Cairo (Ga. 1909)
- Wall v. Mercer (Ga. 1904)
- Rucker v. Tabor & Almand (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)
- McGregor v. Third National Bank of Atlanta (Ga. 1905)
- Fleming v. Roberts (Ga. 1902)
- Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock (Ga. 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There was no brief of the evidence in this case, nor bona fide attempt to make one. The document purporting to be such was a detailed report of the trial, including, without even the appearance of necessity, all manner of useless and irrelevant matter. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Southern Mining Company v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264; Price v. High cG Co., 108 Ga. 145, and cases therein cited. If any error was committed at the trial below, the plaintiff in error has not, as it was incumbent upon him to do, affirmatively, and in the manner prescribed by law, so shown to this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.