Foster v. Sutlive
Foster v. Sutlive
110 Ga. 297; 34 S.E. 1037; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 370
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- McIntosh v. MARVIN M. BLACK COMPANY (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
- Trotter v. Lunceford (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
- Alropa Corp. v. Richardson (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
- Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Southern Surety Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
- Thornton v. Reeve (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)
- Few v. Pou (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
- Lamon v. Perry (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
- Allen v. Commercial Credit Co. (Ga. 1923)
- Ross v. Glover-Ball Co. (Ga. 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. When the assignee of a chose in action brings suit thereon, the petition should allege that the assignment was in writing; and a demurrer to the petition because of the want of such an allegation should have been sustained. Hartford Ins. Co. v. Amos, 98 Ga. 533, and cases cited.
2. The demurrer to the petition having been erroneously overruled, all occurring upon the trial was nugatory.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.