Brown v. Holland
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Shuford v. Shuford (Ga. 1914)
- Berry v. State (Ga. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
If, after a judgment for money has been rendered in the trial court and affirmed by the Supreme Court, an “extraordinary” motion for a new trial, based on the ground that the judge by whom the judgment was rendered was disqualified because of relationship to the plaintiff’s attorney, who had a contingent interest in the recovery, can in any case be held good, it certainly can not when it appears that, before the rendition of the judgment, the defendant’s attorney knew of the relationship and knew that the plaintiff’s attorney had such an interest.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.